Manufacturing News and Trends

Fed board widens union protest powers

Even employers that aren’t involved in union disputes can be the targets of “secondary” union action.

The union practice known as “bannering” got the seal of approval from the National Labor Relations Board in a recent ruling in the case Sheet Metal Workers Int’l Ass’n, Local 15, 356 NLRB No. 162. Essentially, the ruling means that unions can set up displays (in this case, a large inflatable replica of a rat) and hand out leaflets on the grounds of an employer that does business with a company that’s involved in a union dispute.

Previously, some courts had ruled that such activity violated NLRB regulations designed to prevent picketing at a company that’s not involved in a dispute with a union. This latest ruling changes all that by:

  • still barring “picketing” — or confrontational behavior by the union — but allowing union members to set up “informational” displays and hand out leaflets detailing the dispute with the third-party employer
  • providing First Amendment protections to such activity, and
  • forcing the employer to prove that such activity is confrontational and interfering with company operations.

In practice, here’s what it means. If you outsource or hire a contractor to do work on your site – maybe even a janitorial service — and that contractor is involved in a labor dispute, the union can set up a “non-confrontational” protest at your site.

Subscribe Today

Get the latest manufacturing industry news and trends delivered to your inbox.
  • Randy

    A large rat is “informational”? Right.

  • Merrill

    In other words, the property rights of the business mean nothing. The NLRB has arbitrarily transferred the property rights of the uninvolved business owner to the unions. The NRLB seems hell-bent to give unions as much leverage as possible, to the detriment of businesses. What gives the NRLB the right to take my rights away to give to a third party? Even worse if I have no direct involvement with the third party. Very Soviet of them. If I were a business owner in such a circumstance, I would regard anything left on my property as my own, to do with as I please. That is your right as a property owner. Let them fight it in court. Make the unions waste their time and money. If that doesn’t work, I would find a way to erect a counterprotest, ridiculing the unions.

  • Tim

    This is just wrong. They should not be allowed to picket my business simply because I have done business with a company they are striking against. Even if it is “non-confrontational” it is based on intimadation and smacks of mafia tactics.

  • http://graymetal.com PO’d Mfg Guy

    The NLRB should be defunded and dissolved. They are way out of bounds here.

  • Frances

    The NLRB has become yet another anti-business policy making arm of the Obama administration.

  • Gary Roadhouse

    This is just another act by the out of hand dictatorship of Obama/Soros/and the others who are actually pulling the little puppets strings. There used to be laws against tresspassing NRLB. What happen to those? What is it that makes you think you are now above the law. This is not about right and wrong. This IS all about the dems and their “How do we just get votes” policy. America be damned, freedom be damned, the constitution be damned. WE WANT POWER. Time for the next revolution citizens and it starts at the polls!!!

  • Pingback: Netflix

  • Merrill

    What PO’d Mfg Guy said. Except that I would add that the fact that the NLRB exists at all is way out of bounds.