Manufacturing News and Trends

High Court ruling warns about handling complaints

If an employee walks up to you and says he’s having problems with the time clock, is that a legal “complaint”? The U.S. Supreme Court just answered the question.

Actually, what the court did was define the phrase “file a complaint” – which is the language used in the Fair Labor Standards Act governing issues of pay, time keeping and some working conditions.

The question before the court was whether an employee who, in conversation, had told his supervisor about problems with the company time clock could later claim that he had “filed” a complaint.

The short answer from the court: Yes, an oral complaint does amount to “filing” a complaint. Here’s why the ruling is important:

The employee in the case had been disciplined several times for time-clock violations, and finally was fired. The employee sued the company, saying the termination was in retaliation for complaints about the problems with the company’s time clock. The FLSA strictly forbids retaliation for complaints about pay and time keeping.

The company’s argument: The conversations didn’t amount to complaints, since they’d never been written down, and so there could be no charge of retaliation for complaining.

The court’s decision: Employee wins. The word file (a complaint) includes conversations.

The lesson: When an employee mentions any problems with pay, time keeping, etc., document the complaint and how it was addressed. Most of all, take such oral complaints as seriously as if they were written.

Cite: Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.

Subscribe Today

Get the latest manufacturing industry news and trends delivered to your inbox.
  • http://graymetal.com Itjustgetscrazier

    So once again the onus is on the employer, this time to record every conversation as if it were written. Well, it should be written, but who does the writing? Not the employee. Whenever an employee complained to me about an issue I’d tell them to put it in writing. The vast majority never did because they never wanted to put their name on some complaint they knew was bogus in the first place. Now thanks to the enlightened Supremes, employees don’t have to put it in writing. I do. That sucks.

  • http://www.eye2eyeconsulting.com Michelle

    Sounds to me like toxic work environments. Don’t get me wrong, there is definitely a need to make sure your bases are covered. I just think that if everyone took a little more time to understand the people on either side of the equation and we were a little more invested in being humane towards each other that matters like the case mentioned would not result in court cases as often. Just my two cents
    http://su.pr/8TCKrr

  • http://graymetal.com Getreal

    Has anyone else noticed that the vast majority of recent court rulings and agency regs and rules are putting more and more responsibility on the employer? If the trend continues, employees won’t have to do anything but show up to collect a paycheck.