manufacturingweekly.com » Report: Capitol littered with workplace hazards

Report: Capitol littered with workplace hazards

July 19, 2010 by Alex Irwin
Posted in: In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views, News, Safety and Health

Everyone knows the one about glass houses — everyone except the feds, apparently. A recent report revealed the U.S. Capitol and surrounding buildings have an estimated 6,300 workplace hazards.

While Obama’s OSHA continues to ramp up fines, criminal penalties and oversight for companies, the seat of the legislative branch wouldn’t even pass its own inspection, according to a recent report from the Office of Compliance.

And many of the hazards pose major risks to employees — one-quarter of them could be deadly or cause serious injury. And some will cost a lot to fix. One example: A fire hazard in the Library of Congress will cost nearly $20 million to repair.

How’d all of these hazards slip by in the first place? Congress exempted itself from parts of federal workplace law, so it hasn’t been forced to update its facilities.

Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply


advertisement

Whitepapers


    Quick Vote

    • Is your company hiring?

      • Yes (53%, 102 Votes)
      • No (46%, 88 Votes)
      • Not Sure (1%, 3 Votes)

      Total Voters: 193

      Loading ... Loading ...

  • advertisement

    See what readers are saying...

    • BMW: My opinion is the employer has to much control now. There is no protection for how the employee gets treated. They can t...
    • MFG Goon: Preface: Bullying is inappropriate. Now that we have that out of the way... The word "bullying" gets thrown around wa...
    • Jim Munroe: Ya, I wonder if they are the same folks who made the "touchless soap dispenser" too....
    • Bill Kowalski: I doubt it will make any difference at all, since chemical dangers are only a tiny fraction of the causes of workplace i...
    • Bill Kowalski: Huh, lucky that paper towel company did that study of reusable towels....
    • Bill Kowalski: This certainly has a pro-slime bias. It doesn't mention in any detail what the pink slime is, and how the product itse...







    a